Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New information on Jan 6th

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New information on Jan 6th

    New information sheds more light in Jan 6th

  • #2
    Pardoned by Trump - a criminal. Typical of the kind of person our resident right-wingers adore and love.

    Comment


    • #3
      Lol

      Comment


      • #4
        I'll wait for the "new information on January 6" that will come from the Congressional Committee...

        Comment


        • #5
          Epoch Times, The GW Pundit and D’Souza Podcast…

          the triumvirate of fake news!

          Comment


          • #6
            D'Souza! 🤣

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by B-Large View Post
              Epoch Times, The GW Pundit and D’Souza Podcast…

              the triumvirate of fake news!
              Weekly World News and National Enquirer are better sources than the ones the right-wingers regularly use.

              Comment


              • #8
                D’Souza is awesome. Listen up!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by W*GS View Post

                  Weekly World News and National Enquirer are better sources than the ones the right-wingers regularly use.
                  Just like putting a nose in the Bible, if you want to find it, and look hard enough, you will!

                  hence the flimsy “news” outlets that apparently fired all their editors and spellcheckers.. 😂

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post
                    D’Souza is awesome. Listen up!
                    That you admire him says volumes about your standards.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post
                      D’Souza is awesome. Listen up!
                      D'Souza accepted a presidential pardon -- tacitly admitting to having committed crimes. Thus, he is a criminal; not awesome.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Blueflame View Post

                        D'Souza accepted a presidential pardon -- tacitly admitting to having committed crimes. Thus, he is a criminal; not awesome.
                        Lots of political persecution. He’s a great guy. Democrats are on witch hunts for anyone standing in their way. Nazi style.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Blueflame View Post

                          D'Souza accepted a presidential pardon -- tacitly admitting to having committed crimes. Thus, he is a criminal; not awesome.
                          PGII loves him some serpents!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Roh View Post

                            PGII loves him some serpents!
                            Projection

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Blueflame View Post
                              I'll wait for the "new information on January 6" that will come from the Congressional Committee...
                              Well..if you listen to what the presenter has to say, you would realize it has nothing to do with the Congress and relates to the DoJ charges..already filed and does not pertain to Congresses actions.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post

                                Well..if you listen to what the presenter has to say, you would realize it has nothing to do with the Congress and relates to the DoJ charges..already filed and does not pertain to Congresses actions.
                                Listening to what the presenter has to say -- failed to make it to my "to-do list" for today though. As noted, I don't put much stock in what criminals have to say. Others' mileage will vary.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Blueflame View Post

                                  Listening to what the presenter has to say -- failed to make it to my "to-do list" for today though. As noted, I don't put much stock in what criminals have to say. Others' mileage will vary.
                                  I'll remember that, but regardless...it's an interesting point about the charges, why the doj says the capital was a restricted building, and whether it actually was based on the dojs reasoning for the charges. They might have ****ed it up.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post

                                    I'll remember that, but regardless...it's an interesting point about the charges, why the doj says the capital was a restricted building, and whether it actually was based on the dojs reasoning for the charges. They might have ****ed it up.
                                    Glad someone is will to look at things objectively.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post

                                      I'll remember that, but regardless...it's an interesting point about the charges, why the doj says the capital was a restricted building, and whether it actually was based on the dojs reasoning for the charges. They might have ****ed it up.
                                      No doubt, if Trump can get himself back into the WH, he'll be able to turn this interpretation of law around and lock up the investigators (like Newt Gingrich has suggested). I'll bet his justice department will act much more quickly. Hell, it's Wonderland; You can make the law say whatever you want it to say.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post

                                        I'll remember that, but regardless...it's an interesting point about the charges, why the doj says the capital was a restricted building, and whether it actually was based on the dojs reasoning for the charges. They might have ****ed it up.
                                        Speaking of stuff like that -- what's your take on Trump's assertion that Pence did have the power to overturn the election? If the VP does have that power, then why do we even bother having elections?

                                        Comment


                                        • #21
                                          Originally posted by Roh View Post

                                          No doubt, if Trump can get himself back into the WH, he'll be able to turn this interpretation of law around and lock up the investigators (like Newt Gingrich has suggested). I'll bet his justice department will act much more quickly. Hell, it's Wonderland; You can make the law say whatever you want it to say.
                                          Whoever has the power….you guys are on your way to losing it…again.

                                          Comment


                                          • #22
                                            Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post

                                            Whoever has the power….you guys are on your way to losing it…again.
                                            That's what you celebrate - The ascendancy of liars who will destroy democracy. Taliban despise democracy as well. It's only natural that dogmatic zealots would be totally opposed to anything that allows humans to make free choices.

                                            Comment


                                            • #23
                                              Originally posted by Blueflame View Post

                                              Speaking of stuff like that -- what's your take on Trump's assertion that Pence did have the power to overturn the election? If the VP does have that power, then why do we even bother having elections?
                                              Havent heard that and no the VP does not have that authority presiding over the Senate nor as VP.

                                              Comment


                                              • #24
                                                Originally posted by Roh View Post

                                                No doubt, if Trump can get himself back into the WH, he'll be able to turn this interpretation of law around and lock up the investigators (like Newt Gingrich has suggested). I'll bet his justice department will act much more quickly. Hell, it's Wonderland; You can make the law say whatever you want it to say.
                                                I don't think he's coming back, he's demented.

                                                Comment


                                                • #25
                                                  Originally posted by Garcia Bronco View Post

                                                  I don't think he's coming back, he's demented.
                                                  That never stopped him before.

                                                  Comment

                                                  Working...
                                                  X