Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sportico Franchise Values

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sportico Franchise Values

    Hey BroncoBuff

    They have Denver at 4.87 Billion....KC Is at 4.5 Billion. Denver is down 4 spots from last year. KC is up one spot.

    In theory Denver should have gone up by more than 5%..... in fact 5% was the WORST growth in value year over year. Most teams were in the 20's. KC saw a whopping 28% increase in team value over the same time period. 5% was worst in the NFL. Denver also dropped more spots than any other team having lost 4 spots year over year.

    Having a great QB on decent contract apparently matters and so does having hte worst QB contract in the NFL.


    2023 Valuation: The sum of the enterprise value of an NFL franchise combined with the value of team-related businesses and real estate holdings. Team Value: NFL franchise valuation, deriv…


  • #2
    .

    Comment


    • #3
      Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	177
Size:	6.9 KB
ID:	272796

      Comment


      • #4
        But but but but ... what happened to "$5 billion and probably much much more" ??

        Ah, forget it! It is pretty funny though, how you post this link and call me in here to show off ... you're so proud! But I gotta ask ... exactly how long you gonna be comfortable and proud being ranked six spots below us?

        Ah, don't worry about it! At this very moment, Wal-Mart is designing and building MAD updates to Empower Field and other Broncos facilities. 3rd largest video screen behind Dallas and SoFi in LA.

        So don't worry, we'll zoom right back up into the Top 10 next year!





        Remember to shop at WalMart!

        Comment


        • #5
          Below is a link to Rocket 7's pics of some of the improvements being done ... notice the huge panel with our three Super Bowl winning logos on it .........

          HEY! Now that you guys (finally) caught up to us six months ago, and you have three Super Bowls too, maybe you should assemble a similar panel for Narrowhead!

          But I have some important advice for you and your panel: Somehow get hold of "special film services" at Warner Brothers in Burbank, California. They're the best in the business at "colorizing" old movies ... they might be able to colorize that antique black&white logo from your first super bowl!

          LINK!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Zerovoltz
            Having a great QB on decent contract apparently matters and so does having hte worst QB contract in the NFL.

            Tell me all about the “great” QB’s on each of the top 5 valued teams.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mozzafiato


              Tell me all about the “great” QB’s on each of the top 5 valued teams.
              I never said it was the be all end all....but in a comparison of KC to Denver....It seems to be a major factor in this most recent evaluation.

              Comment


              • BroncoBuff
                BroncoBuff commented
                Editing a comment
                You are SUCH an idiot. The valuations (no "e") have virtually nothing to do with on-field success, much less is it a "major factor."

              • Zerovoltz
                Zerovoltz commented
                Editing a comment
                Then what changed in the KC metro that caused their value to go up 28%? and Denver’s value to only go up 5%

            • #8
              Originally posted by Zerovoltz

              I never said it was the be all end all....but in a comparison of KC to Denver....It seems to be a major factor in this most recent evaluation.
              According to Forbes the largest factor in team valuation (well over half for most teams) is the shared revenue, followed by market, then stadium, then “brand”. In 2022 Denver’s numbers were $3.195+$0.692+$0.469+$0.294=$4.65. KC’s were $2.700+$0.441+$0.387+$0.173=$3.70. The 2023 details don’t seem to be available yet but I’d be curious to see them to compare.

              Comment


              • #9
                Originally posted by Mozzafiato

                According to Forbes the largest factor in team valuation (well over half for most teams) is the shared revenue, followed by market, then stadium, then “brand”. In 2022 Denver’s numbers were $3.195+$0.692+$0.469+$0.294=$4.65. KC’s were $2.700+$0.441+$0.387+$0.173=$3.70. The 2023 details don’t seem to be available yet but I’d be curious to see them to compare.
                ...just curious....if KC went on sale today...what do you suppose the winning bid would be?

                Comment


                • Paladin
                  Paladin commented
                  Editing a comment
                  $3.95

              • #10
                Virginia Halas’s dad bought the Bears for $100. Now they are worth $6B.

                Comment


                • Mozzafiato
                  Mozzafiato commented
                  Editing a comment
                  It’s one of the most blatant “takes money to make money” situations. The rich get richer!

              • #11
                Originally posted by Zerovoltz

                ...just curious....if KC went on sale today...what do you suppose the winning bid would be?

                I can only guess here, but probably $4.5B-$4.75B neighborhood. Chiefs are limited by their market, and I don’t know much about their stadium situation. And really the team’s value doesn’t matter all that much. It’s more about ownership and growth in revenues and value.

                Comment


                • #12
                  Originally posted by Mozzafiato


                  I can only guess here, but probably $4.5B-$4.75B neighborhood. Chiefs are limited by their market, and I don’t know much about their stadium situation. And really the team’s value doesn’t matter all that much. It’s more about ownership and growth in revenues and value.
                  .....I think you get 5 because you are getting a team in a strong title window becasue of the QB.

                  ...even at your figure of 4.75 (consistantly/close to the article) KC closed the gap on what Denvers value is....and Denver has a recent sale, which of course is a true indicator of what htey are actually valued at....because someone paid it.

                  As the market in KC didn't get subtstantially better, the stadium is old, while Denver is growing a faster pace and already is a bigger city than KC...I have to think that Mahomes is/Lomardi potential is why KC is closing the gap.

                  Comment


                  • #13
                    Originally posted by Zerovoltz

                    .....I think you get 5 because you are getting a team in a strong title window becasue of the QB.

                    ...even at your figure of 4.75 (consistantly/close to the article) KC closed the gap on what Denvers value is....and Denver has a recent sale, which of course is a true indicator of what htey are actually valued at....because someone paid it.

                    As the market in KC didn't get subtstantially better, the stadium is old, while Denver is growing a faster pace and already is a bigger city than KC...I have to think that Mahomes is/Lomardi potential is why KC is closing the gap.

                    Agree, they are definitely factors. Just not huge ones. For example, Chiefs were selling out before Mahomes. And revenue sharing smoothes out the positive effects teams get from being contenders.

                    Comment


                    • #14
                      Originally posted by Zerovoltz
                      Hey BroncoBuff

                      Denver at 4.87 Billion....KC Is at 4.5 Billion.

                      LOL. KC wins a Superbowl and Denver has one of their worst seasons ever, firing their Head Coach...but the Broncos are still worth more. That's hilarious. You're a dumbass.

                      Comment


                      • #15
                        Originally posted by listopencil


                        LOL. KC wins a Superbowl and Denver has one of their worst seasons ever, firing their Head Coach...but the Broncos are still worth more. That's hilarious. You're a dumbass.
                        All determined by market size baby

                        Comment


                        • #16
                          Originally posted by Strip Sacked

                          All determined by market size baby
                          It's just funny to me that a Chiefs fan came over here to start this thread on a Bronco board. The guy seems obsessed.

                          Comment


                          • #17
                            Originally posted by listopencil

                            It's just funny to me that a Chiefs fan came over here to start this thread on a Bronco board. The guy seems obsessed.
                            He has gone full cringe. He’s like the unpopular kid who just tries TOO hard. No one laughs at his jokes. Everyone is embarrassed FOR him.

                            Imagine feeling so small you dig this up and post it here.

                            Comment


                            • #18
                              Originally posted by Zerovoltz
                              .....I think you get 5 (billion for chefs) because you are getting a team in a strong title window becasue of the QB.
                              Wrong again!

                              Gotta remind everybody that this topic is re-surfacing because I called out ZeroTroll's LIE that chefs owner Clark Hunt said chefs were worth "Five billion and maybe much more." He posted that lie on this Broncos board shortly after the Broncos sold for $4.65 B, in an obvious effort to "one up" our team.

                              And now, in the above-quoted post, he's pushing this same "5 billion" nonsense yet again. So it's time again, for another chef-troll beat-down:

                              Zero ... Your latest $5 billion fib is actually $500 million dollars more than the very site you quoted to start this thread!

                              That site is Sportico, which might be a decent sports site, but reporting on billion dollar issues is better handled by Forbes. They've been reporting franchise valuations for 20+ years. Their latest valuations are not nearly as kind:
                              .
                              Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_20230811-232432.png Views:	0 Size:	623.4 KB ID:	273993
                              Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_20230812-173352.png Views:	0 Size:	67.0 KB ID:	273995
                              Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_20230811-232658.png Views:	0 Size:	58.4 KB ID:	273997
                              Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_20230811-232728.png Views:	0 Size:	63.9 KB ID:	273999

                              Awwwww!

                              chefs just 3-point-7 billion? That's less than 5, isn't it? And 23rd in the League ... OUCH!

                              But look closer... the second image above - the "by lines" image - look close: August 22, 2022. That's the date the story was published. And that means Forbes new 2023 NFL team valuations are probably gonna drop in a week or two! I suggest you open their homepage and start refreshing every few seconds like a madman, until you can come back here and announce, like you did in the first post above:

                              "BroncoBuff! Look BroncoBuff! Now we're just $1.1 billion dollars less valuable than you!"

                              I can't wait.


                              __________________

                              In my next post, below, I'll explain how pro sports franchise values are calculated, and how Zero's dishonest justifications for his false claims were hatched.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • #19
                                Originally posted by Zerovoltz
                                .......I think you get 5 (billion for KC chefs) because you are getting a team in a strong title window becasue of Mahomes.
                                .......even at your figure of 4.75
                                ....... KC closed the gap on what Denvers value is.......
                                1) No, that's not "my figure." For my figure I'm going with Forbes current valuation of the chefs at $3.7 b.

                                2) No, that's not how you "closed the gap." So, you ask, "then how DID the chefs 'close the gap' BroncoBuff, huh? How DID we?!"
                                Well, The Forbes article explained (link) the main reason how EVERY franchise value got bumped up an average of 24% this year. The main reason is ......


                                is ...


                                is ...



                                wait for it ...


                                The just-completed sale of the Denver Broncos for $4.65 billion!!

                                "You're welcome!" - The Denver Broncos.



                                Originally posted by Zerotroll
                                As the market in KC didn't get subtstantially better, the stadium is old, while Denver is growing ... and already is a bigger city than KC...
                                Really? Denver is "already a bigger city than KC"??

                                Newsflash:
                                Denver is a MUCH "bigger" city than KC. It's bigger now, and has been bigger since before either town had a football team. Denver is the 17th largest TV market in the country, Kansas City is 33rd (I think the only NFL markets smaller than KC are Green Bay and Buffalo. Maybe Jacksonville). And TV market is the relevant measure, because pre-season game TV telecasts, coach's TV shows, and (I think) radio broadcasts all generate franchise profits, as opposed to other incomes that are subject to NFL revenue sharing.

                                You're half-right when you mentioned 'stadiums,' but it doesn't really matter how old a stadium is, what matters is how much premium seating (sky boxes) it has, it's parking, concessions, restaurants and any other attractions and revenue generators a stadium has.

                                As the Forbes article explains, franchise values are based on a multiplier of revenue generators, and those values started to skyrocket when the Tepper family bought the Carolina Panthers.

                                Here's how a franchise is valued:
                                .
                                ​​​​​​ Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_20230811-220136.png Views:	0 Size:	227.3 KB ID:	274012

                                Kinda boring, huh? To be honest, even me - and I am NOT a chefs fan - but even in the back of my mind I thought, "really? They go to all these super bowls and that doesn't matter?" But no, franchise on-field successes ebb and flow - (e.g. a decade ago, who would think today's AFC power rankings: KC, Cincinnati, Buffalo?). Nope. Look at Washington and Chicago ... Top 5 or so in value, but neither one won a playoff game in this century.
                                Attached Files

                                Comment


                                • #20

                                  Comment


                                  • Mozzafiato
                                    Mozzafiato commented
                                    Editing a comment
                                    Chiefs at 23! Sad!!

                                • #21
                                  Will the family of evil oil tycoon Haraldson Lafayette Hunt sell the team to the Saudis, perpetrators of the crime of the century, for 8 billion dollars? 🤔

                                  Comment


                                  • #22
                                    Originally posted by Mozzafiato
                                    The AFC’s final four are ranked 23 (chiefs), 28 (jags), 30 (bills) and 32 (bengals)

                                    So much for having great QBs and title contenders.

                                    Comment


                                    • #23
                                      Originally posted by Ark
                                      The AFC’s final four are ranked 23 (chiefs), 28 (jags), 30 (bills) and 32 (bengals)

                                      So much for having great QBs and title contenders.
                                      I'm thinking these new 2023 Forbes rankings will finally put an end to Zero's embarrassing, Quixotic crusade to cure his fibbing that chefs were worth "Five billion dollars and probably much more."

                                      In case you didn't notice, Zero, the Broncos new valuation is HALF A BILLION DOLLARS HIGHER than last year!

                                      And remember, Forbes credited last year's strikingly huge jump in all franchise values to the sale price of the Broncos, and not to QBs. I haven't read this year's article yet, but I'm confident that our half-a-billion increase, along with whatever increases might have occurred among the lower tiers of teams will be credited to the Washington Commander's sale price this year.



                                      Originally posted by Ark
                                      The AFC’s final four:
                                      23 (Kansas City chiefs)
                                      28 (Jacksonville jags)
                                      30 (Buffalo bills)
                                      32 (Cincinnati bengals)

                                      Wow.... paraphrasing your post Ark, to point out some fascinating facts:

                                      The least valuable AFC franchises include the #1 #2 and #3 best, highest ranked on-field teams - KC Buff Cincy.

                                      And all four of them plus Green Bay = NFL's FIVE SMALLEST TV MARKETS!

                                      Comment


                                      • #24
                                        I stand by my statement. If KC went on the market today, they'd get 5 billion. Both the Broncos and Washington sales were in teh neighborhood of 20% over the prior years Forbes valuation.

                                        Comment


                                        • #25
                                          Originally posted by Zerovoltz
                                          I stand by my statement. If KC went on the market today, they'd get 5 billion. Both the Broncos and Washington sales were in teh neighborhood of 20% over the prior years Forbes valuation.
                                          Of course you do. Obviously you're unfamiliar with the truism, the phrase, (not to mention the personal philosophy):

                                          . . "Accountability breeds trust."

                                          If you can't be accountable for a silly lie like this one you told on an anonymous website, then I shudder to think what a vapid void of character you must be in person.
                                          .
                                          ..

                                          . . .
                                          Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_20230901-002228.png Views:	0 Size:	195.5 KB ID:	281487
                                          Attached Files

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X
                                          😀
                                          🥰
                                          🤢
                                          😎
                                          😡
                                          👍
                                          👎