Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oppenheimer

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Oppenheimer

    Cannot WAIT for this movie .....

    Christopher Nolan has a warning for anyone purchasing “Oppenheimer” tickets: The film might emotionally destroy you. Speaking to Wired magazine in a new interview, Nolan said that some early “Oppenheimer” viewers have had a visceral reaction to the film, which follows theoretical physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) as he creates the atomic bomb to […]

    Opens in IMAX and Dolby theaters July 21

    ​​
    "NOW I AM BECOME DEATH The DESTROYER of WORLDS"

    Not a horror movie, but rather a psychological biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the genius physicist who, during WWII, oversaw the United States' Manhattan Project that created the world's first nuclear weapons.

    Oppenheimer was thoughtful, socially aware, and he struggled with the uncertainty of what long-term far-flung effects would attach to his work. During his Manhattan Project years in New Mexico, his interests ranged from teaching himself Sanskrit, to in-depth explorations of Mysticism, to study of Hindu scriptures from the Bhagavad Gita, which he read in their original Sanskrit.

    After WWII, he was horrified by a popular moniker he was tagged with: "Father of the Atomic Bomb."


  • #2
    Well yeah. They got the blueprints from those stories that the atheist/science says are fantasy. You know,,,,the there's no proof of alien life in our universe but us crowd.

    Comment


    • #3

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by OmegaBronco
        Well yeah. They got the blueprints from those stories that the atheist/science says are fantasy. You know,,,,the there's no proof of alien life in our universe but us crowd.
        Hunh?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by W*GS

          Hunh?
          Where do you think they got the idea for a super weapon from? Why do you think there was so much interest in ancient archeology in the late 1800/early1900s? --> They uncovered texts that describe how to build nuclear weapons. That's why there was a race to build a nuclear bomb in WW2. Engineering had finally developed enough to build such a weapon.

          Comment


          • #6
            Oh. Well that clears it up.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by BroncoBuff
              Oh. Well that clears it up.
              Why the interest in learning Sanskrit? If you want to open your mind,,there's some wild stories from the ancient Gods. The prophet religions however are completely different which dominate the globe today.

              Edit: Nothing personnel, But sad that a lawyer doesn't know where law comes from.
              Last edited by OmegaBronco; 07-10-2023, 10:56 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by OmegaBronco
                Why the interest in learning Sanskrit? If you want to open your mind,,there's some wild stories from the ancient Gods. The prophet religions however are completely different which dominate the globe today.

                Edit: Nothing personnel, But sad that a lawyer doesn't know where law comes from.
                You shame me so ...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BroncoBuff

                  You shame me so ...
                  You feeling ok? I would at least expect a "you shame so ..." 😀. I should have expanded, it's a shame that so much history has been hidden from us. But yeah, nuclear weapons is discussed in detail in Sanskrit. -- Pakistan and India don't have running water but they have nuclear weapons. Go figure.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by OmegaBronco
                    You feeling ok? I would at least expect a "you shame so ..." 😀. I should have expanded, it's a shame that so much history has been hidden from us. But yeah, nuclear weapons is discussed in detail in Sanskrit. -- Pakistan and India don't have running water but they have nuclear weapons. Go figure.
                    Of course not, no atomic/nuclear weapons are discussed in the the Bhagavad Gita​, his interest in mysticism and Sanskrit were likely unrelated to his work. Unless they set forth some ethical or life philosophy he might have been drawn to as a counterpoint to the practical horror of his creation.

                    He spoke several languages I think, not just Sanskrit

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by BroncoBuff

                      Of course not, no atomic/nuclear weapons are discussed in the the Bhagavad Gita​, his interest in mysticism and Sanskrit were likely unrelated to his work. Unless they set forth some ethical or life philosophy he might have been drawn to as a counterpoint to the practical horror of his creation.

                      He spoke several languages I think, not just Sanskrit
                      Just a curiosity -- lol. So he could read near/far eastern fantasy stories. Oh my.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by OmegaBronco

                        Just a curiosity -- lol. So he could read near/far eastern fantasy stories. Oh my.
                        Why you baggin' on J. Robert?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by OmegaBronco

                          Where do you think they got the idea for a super weapon from? Why do you think there was so much interest in ancient archeology in the late 1800/early1900s? --> They uncovered texts that describe how to build nuclear weapons. That's why there was a race to build a nuclear bomb in WW2. Engineering had finally developed enough to build such a weapon.
                          You’re a loony.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by W*GS

                            You’re a loony.
                            Funny. I wouldn't have pegged you a fan of the prophet religions. But here we are.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by BroncoBuff

                              Why you baggin' on J. Robert?
                              All the evidence is there...you just willfully choose to ignore it.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by OmegaBronco
                                All the evidence is there...you just willfully choose to ignore it.
                                Show us.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by W*GS

                                  Show us.
                                  Prove we can build the great pyramids today. Or Angkor Wat. -- LOL​ Slavery exist for thousands of years after the great pyramids were built,,,yet no more monumental buildings to rival the pyramids...hmmm - LOL at you quoting hundred year old ideas. You're a real modern thinker.
                                  Last edited by OmegaBronco; 07-11-2023, 04:09 PM.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by OmegaBronco
                                    Prove we can build the great pyramids today. Or Angkor Wat. -- LOL​ Slavery exist for thousands of years after the great pyramids were built,,,yet no more monumental buildings to rival the pyramids...hmmm - LOL at you quoting hundred year old ideas. You're a real modern thinker.
                                    You don't think we can build a pyramid so therefore von Däniken is correct.

                                    You're missing about 2,000-3,000 steps to prove yourself right. Get started:

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by W*GS

                                      You don't think we can build a pyramid so therefore von Däniken is correct.

                                      You're missing about 2,000-3,000 steps to prove yourself right. Get started:
                                      FWIW, I think it is poured concrete. The guys that pushed the narrative that slaves pulled those stones in place is pretty laughable. Still the popular opinion in academia today I believe.

                                      As for Sanskirt writings and Jewish beliefs...that's you crapping on them not me. Cause I suspect the same guys that gave us the lunacy that is taught today were likely into prophet religions. Thus the need for the hairbrain explanations that is taught today. Can't make tenor if you want to think for yourself.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        what is happening in this thread

                                        Comment


                                        • #21
                                          Originally posted by Aztec Bronco
                                          what is happening in this thread
                                          Just the boomers being boomers. Being scared of new ideas and thoughts.

                                          Comment


                                          • #22
                                            BB starting the same thread I did a month before this one. I should sue his ass for copyright infringement!

                                            Comment


                                            • Mile High Salute
                                              Mile High Salute commented
                                              Editing a comment
                                              Sad! 😆

                                            • BroncoBuff
                                              BroncoBuff commented
                                              Editing a comment
                                              PLEASE NO! I throw myself on the mercy of the court ... I plead insanity ... diminished cap-ass-itty ... (truth is I never saw that thread 🙄

                                          • #23
                                            Originally posted by qbronco
                                            BB starting the same thread I did a month before this one. I should sue his ass for copyright infringement!
                                            His research skillz are lacking to say the least.

                                            Comment


                                            • #24
                                              Gaffney and Omega definitely broke bread on some lazy hazy day in the 70s.

                                              You can’t be the “all the evidence is there” guy and provide zero evidence lol

                                              Comment


                                              • #25
                                                Originally posted by Aztec Bronco
                                                Gaffney and Omega definitely broke bread on some lazy hazy day in the 70s.

                                                You can’t be the “all the evidence is there” guy and provide zero evidence lol
                                                Neither side can be proved. At least my side has detailed written documentation dating back 1000s of years from multiple sources in multiple countries. Then there's ancient cities and monuments. Your side is some dude's opinion a 100+ years ago and guys wanting to make tenor.
                                                Last edited by OmegaBronco; 07-13-2023, 04:43 PM.

                                                Comment

                                                Working...
                                                X
                                                😀
                                                🥰
                                                🤢
                                                😎
                                                😡
                                                👍
                                                👎