Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

50% anti vaxx NBC says

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 50% anti vaxx NBC says

    So, if you oppose a vaccine requirement, you are an anti-vaxxer. Well, an official NBC News Survey by Hart Research found that 50% of American adults opposed “requiring that everyone who is now eligible must get a COVID-19 vaccine.” It appears half of Americans are now officially anti-vaxxers.

    The zealous and often illogical promotion of vaccines by the government appears to have officially turned a majority of Americans into anti-vaxxers.  Not metaphorically, but apparently, literally as a matter of basic English. (Article by Aaron Siri republished from AaronSiri.Substack.com) The

  • #2
    Natural News (formerly NewsTarget, which is now a separate sister site) is a far-right, anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and fake news website known for promoting alternative medicine, pseudoscience, and far-right extremism.[1][2][3][4]

    Are any of your sources not from nut job sites that actually report truth and not made up garbage? I honestly don't think you would know an actual news article if it jumped out and bit you.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by ElwayMD View Post
      Natural News (formerly NewsTarget, which is now a separate sister site) is a far-right, anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and fake news website known for promoting alternative medicine, pseudoscience, and far-right extremism.[1][2][3][4]

      Are any of your sources not from nut job sites that actually report truth and not made up garbage? I honestly don't think you would know an actual news article if it jumped out and bit you.
      Liberals so scared of the truth. Always ad hominem attacks.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ElwayMD View Post
        Are any of your sources not from nut job sites that actually report truth and not made up garbage?
        Nope.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post

          Liberals so scared of the truth. Always ad hominem attacks.
          The truth? What truth? That you live in La La land? Zero articles you post have any credibility. That does scare me, you are right. I know the only sites that agree with your worldview are ones that have been demonetized or removed from mainstream media. I'm sure in your mind that makes them the tellers of the truth and the last bastion of freedom, but it doesn't. Reality is a hard pill to swallow and right now you have a giant horse pill of reality that needs gulping down.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ElwayMD View Post

            The truth? What truth? That you live in La La land? Zero articles you post have any credibility. That does scare me, you are right. I know the only sites that agree with your worldview are ones that have been demonetized or removed from mainstream media. I'm sure in your mind that makes them the tellers of the truth and the last bastion of freedom, but it doesn't. Reality is a hard pill to swallow and right now you have a giant horse pill of reality that needs gulping down.
            Only God has truth.

            Liberal BS like snopes & fact check only work on the weak minded such as yourself. The polls on MSM tell you that they aren’t believed by most.

            Comment


            • #7
              Overall, pollsters found wide agreement that U.S. media is necessary to ward off misinformation, but few Americans believe that job is being tackled by the press.

              ‌“Most Americans have lost confidence in the media to deliver the news objectively,” said Sam Gill, Knight’s senior vice president and chief program officer. “This is corrosive for our democracy.”

              The poll reports Republicans (71%) more often than Democrats (22%) and independents (52%) have unfavorable opinions of media outlets. More than 4 out of 5 Americans (86%) say that news organizations advocate political viewpoints rather than report the news free of bias.
              Americans' distrust for the news media to tell the story straight has reached unprecedented levels, an alarming development for any functioning democracy, a new poll reveals.

              Comment


              • #8
                It’s funny they assume a huge amount of people who got vaccinated agrees with the forcing of vaccination on others.


                another week another thousands of strokes and heart attacks that are just a “coincidence”. Buddy of mine in Hawaii completely healthy 38 years old took booster a week later having quad bypass surgery from a heart attack. **** the vaccine.

                people getting ****ed up by that 3rd shot. Good thing the lions had booster week to decimate their roster.

                Last edited by The1percentKid; 12-13-2021, 02:15 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by The1percentKid View Post
                  It’s funny they assume a huge amount of people who got vaccinated agrees with the forcing of vaccination on others.


                  another week another thousands of strokes and heart attacks that are just a “coincidence”. Buddy of mine in Hawaii completely healthy 38 years old took booster a week later having quad bypass surgery from a heart attack. **** the vaccine.

                  people getting ****ed up by that 3rd shot. Good thing the lions had booster week to decimate their roster.
                  The ruling elite don’t like the pushback. People are smarter and fighting courageously.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post

                    The ruling elite don’t like the pushback. People are smarter and fighting courageously.
                    Remember Dallas Buyers Club?


                    who was the big Pharma villain? Faucism.




                    Rams bragged about their vaccine status. Now they in a full outbreak. Much like every team who’s bragged about being vaccinated.

                    if none of them were vaccinated 0 of them would’ve died….but it lessens the symptoms!!!!!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      A state could be 100% vaccinated and clowns would still be blaming the “anti vax” for endless surges.



                      this will be the norm forever. Covid will never go away and it will never be as low as they assume it would. It will always be rampant in society. Just like the flu.

                      “boosters” are now flu shots. Every year they’ll need to be taken every 6 months for the rest of your lives, until you die from the poison

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by The1percentKid View Post
                        A state could be 100% vaccinated and clowns would still be blaming the “anti vax” for endless surges.



                        this will be the norm forever. Covid will never go away and it will never be as low as they assume it would. It will always be rampant in society. Just like the flu.

                        “boosters” are now flu shots. Every year they’ll need to be taken every 6 months for the rest of your lives, until you die from the poison
                        Big Pharmaceuticals $$$

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post

                          Liberals so scared of the truth. Always ad hominem attacks.
                          Just curious. Would you accept information posted by someone here that referenced, say, DailyKos?

                          Also, I am bullish on vaccines. I am generally against vaccine mandates. And calling me an anti-vaxxer might lead to a fistfight. By my and most people's definitions, "anti-vaxxer" refers to someone who refuses vaccines.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by DomCasual View Post

                            Just curious. Would you accept information posted by someone here that referenced, say, DailyKos?

                            Also, I am bullish on vaccines. I am generally against vaccine mandates. And calling me an anti-vaxxer might lead to a fistfight. By my and most people's definitions, "anti-vaxxer" refers to someone who refuses vaccines.
                            I don’t know what DailyKos is. During my bachelor’s degree I took several philosophy courses. One was ‘Critical Thinking’. An exercise we did was to take articles and cross out those statements that are not properly supported. A person should be doing this at all times. Instead, people go by ‘brands’. Organizations like Snopes and other so-called fact checkers may be the most deceptive of all. I do my own fact checking & critical thinking.

                            Well, it’s not me that’s labeling you. I think it’s some of the pro-vaxx org’s. I think people should direct their own healthcare. We just had a holiday gathering and some wore masks. More power to them. Doesn’t hurt my feelings and if that makes them feel safe, awesome.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              "I do all my own fact checking and critical thinking." 😂

                              And oddly enough, still failing miserably at both those endeavors.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Requiem View Post
                                "I do all my own fact checking and critical thinking." 😂

                                And oddly enough, still failing miserably at both those endeavors.
                                My exact opinion of you.

                                Thank you for bringing into adult conversation the ‘I’m rubber you are glue argument’.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post
                                  My exact opinion of you.
                                  You have made posting outright falsehoods and lies a staple in your time spent on Broncos-themed message boards.

                                  That's a very odd thing for someone who doesn't really care about politics to do.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Requiem View Post

                                    You have made posting outright falsehoods and lies a staple in your time spent on Broncos-themed message boards.

                                    That's a very odd thing for someone who doesn't really care about politics to do.
                                    I can tell you are in a bad space. It’s obvious when you follow me around looking for a fight. I hope things get better for you.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post

                                      I don’t know what DailyKos is. During my bachelor’s degree I took several philosophy courses. One was ‘Critical Thinking’. An exercise we did was to take articles and cross out those statements that are not properly supported. A person should be doing this at all times. Instead, people go by ‘brands’. Organizations like Snopes and other so-called fact checkers may be the most deceptive of all. I do my own fact checking & critical thinking.

                                      Well, it’s not me that’s labeling you. I think it’s some of the pro-vaxx org’s. I think people should direct their own healthcare. We just had a holiday gathering and some wore masks. More power to them. Doesn’t hurt my feelings and if that makes them feel safe, awesome.
                                      So, if an article written by Anton LaVey was referenced in a message board post arguing for the morality of, let's say, baby sacrifice, you wouldn't immediately discount the poster who made the comment? The viability of the argument?

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post
                                        I can tell you are in a bad space. It’s obvious when you follow me around looking for a fight. I hope things get better for you.
                                        I'm not looking for a fight. Things here are just fine. I just pointed out the reality of the situation.

                                        You've stated on numerous occasions you don't care for politics. But you start more threads and have more posts in the political sub-forum than anyone here. It's the same story as before. I think any reasonable person would deduce that there is a direct conflict between what you state and put into action.

                                        At any rate, I offered you a chance to reach out to me via PM and discuss things. You ignored that offer. That's a shame.

                                        And by the way, people still aren't "following you around" and never were. This is a message board. An exchange of ideas is to be expected.


                                        Comment


                                        • #21
                                          Originally posted by DomCasual View Post

                                          So, if an article written by Anton LaVey was referenced in a message board post arguing for the morality of, let's say, baby sacrifice, you wouldn't immediately discount the poster who made the comment? The viability of the argument?
                                          No idea of who that is.

                                          Comment


                                          • #22
                                            Anton LaVey was the founder of the Church of Satan.

                                            Comment


                                            • #23
                                              Originally posted by Shellback88 View Post

                                              No idea of who that is.
                                              I don't know if I believe you on that. Google it.

                                              Comment


                                              • #24
                                                Originally posted by Requiem View Post

                                                I'm not looking for a fight. Things here are just fine. I just pointed out the reality of the situation.

                                                You've stated on numerous occasions you don't care for politics. But you start more threads and have more posts in the political sub-forum than anyone here. It's the same story as before. I think any reasonable person would deduce that there is a direct conflict between what you state and put into action.

                                                At any rate, I offered you a chance to reach out to me via PM and discuss things. You ignored that offer. That's a shame.

                                                And by the way, people still aren't "following you around" and never were. This is a message board. An exchange of ideas is to be expected.

                                                I think you know how PM works. If that’s your idea, then go for it.

                                                I don’t care for politics, nor do I put my faith in them. My hope is Jesus. I still stand up for what I believe is to be right, but I also I know the end game.

                                                Comment


                                                • #25
                                                  Originally posted by DomCasual View Post

                                                  I don't know if I believe you on that. Google it.
                                                  If it’s not a pleasant person I’d rather not. I’m guessing your point is some people have more credibility then others based on track record. Is that it?

                                                  Comment

                                                  Working...
                                                  X