Tweet
We had to move the last thread discussion this to the Toilet (I'm open for a better name for that - just not the butt). But it wasn't a bad topic.
As I see it, there are three scenarios with Fangio this offseason. Maybe I'll add a poll:
1) Fangio and most (if not all) of the entire staff is fired;
2) Fangio and most (if not all) of the entire staff is retained; and
3) Fangio is retained, but with conditions.
I have gone almost the entire season, up until Sunday, assuming Fangio's firing was a fait accompli. Now, I'm not so sure.
What scenarios right now get him fired? Or, more appropriately, what scenarios get him retained? If he goes 3-3 down the stretch, is that enough for another year? Are we really going to fire a popular coach (around the league) that overcame a bunch of injuries for a winning record?
I would prefer he goes, unless we make a deep playoff run (which we're not doing). But if he stays and, say, is forced to cede complete authority on the offense to a new OC, and get rid of McMahon on ST, would that be acceptable?
As I see it, there are three scenarios with Fangio this offseason. Maybe I'll add a poll:
1) Fangio and most (if not all) of the entire staff is fired;
2) Fangio and most (if not all) of the entire staff is retained; and
3) Fangio is retained, but with conditions.
I have gone almost the entire season, up until Sunday, assuming Fangio's firing was a fait accompli. Now, I'm not so sure.
What scenarios right now get him fired? Or, more appropriately, what scenarios get him retained? If he goes 3-3 down the stretch, is that enough for another year? Are we really going to fire a popular coach (around the league) that overcame a bunch of injuries for a winning record?
I would prefer he goes, unless we make a deep playoff run (which we're not doing). But if he stays and, say, is forced to cede complete authority on the offense to a new OC, and get rid of McMahon on ST, would that be acceptable?
Comment