Not equal, but unequal share of carries. Not touches mind you. CARRIES.
Don't mind the receptions, so don't misunderstand. He and Melvin Gordon dont need to have equal time.
Not so down on Gordon as many of us should know, RBs have about 4 or 5 good prime seasons and so many drop off a cliff after that year 5.
Need to get as much out of Williams while he is clearly the more effective runner. It may sound cruel, but to have the better, stronger, more effective back on the side in order to fulfill some poor notion that it must be portioned equally is dumb imo.
Must use the more effective more. Does that make sense. Example...
If there are 30 rush attempts by the Broncos in a game, Williams needs 20 and Gordon needs 10. Not 15 and 15.
I think we all agree.
Don't mind the receptions, so don't misunderstand. He and Melvin Gordon dont need to have equal time.
Not so down on Gordon as many of us should know, RBs have about 4 or 5 good prime seasons and so many drop off a cliff after that year 5.
Need to get as much out of Williams while he is clearly the more effective runner. It may sound cruel, but to have the better, stronger, more effective back on the side in order to fulfill some poor notion that it must be portioned equally is dumb imo.
Must use the more effective more. Does that make sense. Example...
If there are 30 rush attempts by the Broncos in a game, Williams needs 20 and Gordon needs 10. Not 15 and 15.
I think we all agree.
Comment